The Great Ideas Letter Forum

Re: Sexless Escort Service

Posted By: Michael Ross
Date: Saturday, 4 December 2004, at 4:37 a.m.

In Response To: Re: Sexless Escort Service (James Jones)

James,

Thanks for clarifying

> Michael, I didn't mean anything derogatory
> and I am sorry if my post came off that way.

I didn't take it any way. I merely saw it as a surf-by comment that needed clarifying.

> It's just that your response seems a bit out
> dated. For example, your comments
> about..."For the technique to work you
> need at least two women and to visibly not
> be attached to either of them."

> You are assuming that it is a good thing to
> show other women that you are not
> "with" either of the girls. In
> actuality women are more attacted to you if
> they think you are with an attractive girl.
> Think of it as social proof. If you show up
> with two attractive women the other women
> will think you are just friends - which
> doesn't do anything to further our goal.

I think some clearing up is needed here too.

For instance: "You are assuming that it is a good thing to show other women that you are not "with" either of the girls."

And: "In actuality women are more attacted to you if they think you are with an attractive girl."

Here you are super-imposing your thoughts onto what I said.

I KNOW other women will find a man more attractive who is with another girl, for that man has the stamp of approval.

But we aren't talking about that here. We are talking about hiring women to accompany you to a location so you can pick up other girls.

With only one girl on your arm, you, it would be assumed, are an item. And while you may have a stamp of approval you are also "off limits" to all but flirting. IF you go ask another girl for her phone number the entire situation will be seen as suspect because the girl you are with will not bat an eyelid.

You also still need to explain her to the girl you are trying to pick up.

Further more, as a couple, the girl on your arm is not likely to just blurt out how wonderful you are while she is in the toilet or at the bar.

To make this more effective for those reasons, you need two girls.

Now, being with the two, if you are obviously with one and not the other, the question then becomes who is this other girl who is just tagging along. Because a girl who is attached won't want a single girl to be a hanger-on. So red flags will be raised by any girl observing you seeming to be with one and not the other. Thus, you cannot appear to be with either one.

Now remember, the guy who started this went out and was obviously not "with" wither of his friends. And yet he got results which is why he started the "service". So either he is wrong, and the numerous examples he cites didn't happen, or they did happen as claimed and a single guy going out with a couple of girls and not obviously with either one, does work.

See. You can argue that a guy with two girl "friends" won't work. But you'll be arguing not with me, but with the guy who started the business because those are the conditions under which it all happened.

Michael Ross

Messages In This Thread

wing women
Ankesh Kothari -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 1:20 a.m.

The scarcity principle at work (among other things)...
Dien Rice -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 3:57 p.m.

Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 8:18 p.m.

Re: human psychology
Ankesh Kothari -- Sunday, 21 November 2004, at 4:31 a.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
James Jones -- Wednesday, 1 December 2004, at 1:13 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Wednesday, 1 December 2004, at 2:42 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
James Jones -- Friday, 3 December 2004, at 1:14 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Saturday, 4 December 2004, at 4:37 a.m.