Re: Sexless Escort Service

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

The Great Ideas Letter Forum

Re: Sexless Escort Service

Posted By: James Jones
Date: Friday, 3 December 2004, at 1:14 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Sexless Escort Service (Michael Ross)

Michael, I didn't mean anything derogatory and I am sorry if my post came off that way.
It's just that your response seems a bit out dated. For example, your comments about..."For the technique to work you need at least two women and to visibly not be attached to either of them."
You are assuming that it is a good thing to show other women that you are not "with" either of the girls. In actuality women are more attacted to you if they think you are with an attractive girl. Think of it as social proof. If you show up with two attractive women the other women will think you are just friends - which doesn't do anything to further our goal.
James
> James,
> Thanks for your comment.
> Please elaborate. What is that suposed to
> mean? What makes you say that?
> Michael Ross

Messages In This Thread

wing women
Ankesh Kothari -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 1:20 a.m.

The scarcity principle at work (among other things)...
Dien Rice -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 3:57 p.m.

Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Friday, 19 November 2004, at 8:18 p.m.

Re: human psychology
Ankesh Kothari -- Sunday, 21 November 2004, at 4:31 a.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
James Jones -- Wednesday, 1 December 2004, at 1:13 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Wednesday, 1 December 2004, at 2:42 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
James Jones -- Friday, 3 December 2004, at 1:14 p.m.

Re: Sexless Escort Service
Michael Ross -- Saturday, 4 December 2004, at 4:37 a.m.

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message: > Michael, I didn't mean anything derogatory > and I am sorry if my post came off that way. > It's just that your response seems a bit out > dated. For example, your comments > about..."For the technique to work you > need at least two women and to visibly not > be attached to either of them." > You are assuming that it is a good thing to > show other women that you are not > "with" either of the girls. In > actuality women are more attacted to you if > they think you are with an attractive girl. > Think of it as social proof. If you show up > with two attractive women the other women > will think you are just friends - which > doesn't do anything to further our goal. > James
If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message, please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
If you'd like to include an image (picture) with your message, please provide the URL address of the image file:
Optional Image URL:
If you'd like e-mail notification of responses, please check this box:

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

The Great Ideas Letter Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.